Body Fat Calculator (US Navy Method)

Estimate body fat percentage from circumference measurements — no scale needed

Estimated body fat
16.9%

The US Navy method (Hodgdon & Beckett, 1984) is a circumference-based estimate, not as accurate as DEXA scanning or hydrostatic weighing. Measure at the narrowest point of the neck and waist, and the widest point of the hips, for the most consistent results. Not a diagnosis.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate is the US Navy method compared to other methods?
It's less accurate than DEXA scanning or hydrostatic (underwater) weighing, but reasonably reliable as a no-equipment estimate when measurements are taken carefully and consistently — useful for tracking your own trend over time more than as a precise one-off number.
Where exactly should I measure?
Neck: just below the larynx (Adam's apple). Waist: at the navel (belly button) level. Hip (women only): at the widest point of the hips/buttocks. Measure with the tape snug but not compressing the skin, and take the reading at the end of a normal exhale for consistency.
Is my data sent anywhere?
No. Everything is calculated locally in your browser.

The US Navy method estimates body fat percentage from a handful of circumference measurements (waist, neck, and for women, hips) rather than requiring specialized equipment like calipers or a DEXA scan — a reasonably accurate, accessible estimation method, though one with real, documented limits on its precision.

Why circumference-based estimation works, with caveats

The US Navy method's formula was developed and validated against more precise body-composition measurement methods (like hydrostatic weighing) across a large sample, and for most people it produces a reasonably close estimate using just a tape measure — no specialized equipment required, unlike calipers (which need training to use consistently) or DEXA scans (which require clinical equipment). The tradeoff is precision: circumference-based methods have a wider margin of error than clinical-grade methods, and accuracy depends heavily on measuring at the exact correct anatomical landmarks with consistent technique — small measurement errors in exactly where the tape is placed produce meaningfully different body fat percentage estimates.

A worked example

The same person measured by two different people, or by the same person on two different occasions with slightly different tape placement, can get body fat percentage estimates that differ by a few percentage points purely from measurement inconsistency — which is why tracking the trend over repeated consistent measurements (same person, same technique, same landmarks) is more meaningful than treating any single measurement as a precise, one-time clinical result.

How this connects to your other health calculations

Body fat percentage gives a more direct picture of body composition than BMI alone, since BMI can't distinguish muscle mass from fat mass — someone with high muscle mass can have an "overweight" BMI while actually having low body fat, which is exactly the gap this calculator is meant to help clarify. For assessing frame size, which affects how to interpret a given weight or measurement set, the Frame Size Calculator is a related but separate measurement.

Common mistakes

Measuring at inconsistent or incorrect anatomical landmarks — the waist measurement point in particular is easy to get wrong, since "waist" in casual use and the exact anatomical measurement point the formula expects aren't always the same location — is the most common source of an inaccurate estimate; following a precise measurement guide for each landmark, rather than estimating by eye, materially improves accuracy.

Related Calculators

Grade CalculatorTime Card CalculatorCalories Burned CalculatorPregnancy Due Date CalculatorShoe Size ConverterRatio Calculator