One Rep Max Calculator

Estimated 1RM from a lifted weight and rep count (Epley & Brzycki formulas)

Epley formula117 kg
Brzycki formula113 kg
100%115 kg
95%109 kg
90%103 kg
85%97 kg
80%92 kg
75%86 kg
70%80 kg
65%74 kg
60%69 kg

This is an estimate for programming percentage-based training, not a recommendation to attempt a true one-rep max without proper form, a spotter, and a warm-up. Estimates get less reliable above ~10 reps.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do the Epley and Brzycki formulas give different results?
Both are estimation formulas fit to different sets of lifting data, and they diverge more at higher rep counts (above ~10 reps). Neither is universally "more correct" — showing both gives you a realistic range.
Is a calculated 1RM safe to actually attempt?
It's an estimate for programming percentage-based training (e.g. "work at 80% of 1RM"), not a recommendation to attempt a true one-rep max without proper form, warm-up, and spotting.

Estimating a one-rep max (1RM) — the maximum weight that could theoretically be lifted for a single repetition — from a lighter weight lifted for multiple reps uses established formulas (Epley and Brzycki are the two most common) rather than requiring an actual maximal single-rep attempt, which carries real injury risk especially for less experienced lifters.

Why formula-based estimation exists, and why two formulas can disagree

Both the Epley and Brzycki formulas estimate 1RM from a submaximal weight-and-reps combination, but they use different underlying mathematical relationships between reps performed and estimated maximum strength — this means the same lifted weight and rep count can produce a slightly different 1RM estimate depending on which formula is used, and neither formula is universally more accurate across every rep range; each tends to perform somewhat differently at very low versus higher rep counts. These formulas are also most reliable within a moderate rep range (roughly single digits to low double digits) — extrapolating from a very high rep count (20+ reps) to estimate 1RM introduces substantially more estimation error than extrapolating from a lower, more moderate rep count.

A worked example

The identical weight-and-reps input run through the Epley formula versus the Brzycki formula can produce two slightly different 1RM estimates — neither is definitively "more correct" in isolation, and for practical training purposes, treating the estimate as a reasonable approximate range rather than an exact number (and testing periodically with lower-rep, more accurate-estimate sets) is more useful than fixating on a single precise figure from either formula.

How this connects to your other health and fitness calculations

1RM estimates are commonly used to set percentage-based training loads for a program — a related but separate calculation from the raw estimate itself. For overall daily energy needs to support a training program, the Calorie/TDEE Calculator and Protein Calculator cover the nutritional side of training that this strength-estimate calculator doesn't address.

Common mistakes

Treating a formula-estimated 1RM as a precise, load-bearing-tested number rather than a reasonable estimate is a common overreach — using an estimated 1RM to set training percentages is standard and useful practice, but attempting an actual maximal single-rep lift purely to "verify" the estimate carries real injury risk that most training programs don't actually require taking.

Related Calculators

Ohm's Law CalculatorTarget Heart Rate CalculatorProfit Margin CalculatorBMI CalculatorPregnancy Due Date CalculatorOvulation Calculator